Friday, March 24, 2006

How To Win On Collapse Puzel

V for Vendetta

Why the Wachowskis have not only adapted and directed this film? On closer inspection it seems that the decision was the right one. There is visual and aural noise of the last two Matrix, so it's much talk and not much left a bad taste in my mouth.
V for Vendetta succeeds in giving a healthy dusting the genre by adding all totalitarian 'system vs the rebel opposition figure V, incarnation of an ideal of revolution dall'assuefazione of mass is a superman who decides to sacrifice himself becoming the symbol easily penetrable in the minds of those caught up in fear and social priorities of global security. It is a film that will be extremely current draw when real events such as attacks and the spread of bird terrostistici in a fiction that we (and we do it) as a spur to warn our reality. Much more effective, therefore, appears to be this film than the Matrix trilogy mainly because it has been decided to focus more on the script that effects familiar. The density of ideas and elements, however, is complementary to a certain rush to compress the whole story until the final catharsis: the more times we find characters that pop up suddenly and instead would require a less risky approach. In fact, one has to sacrifice something. Among these, the interpretation of a Linear Natalie Portman and Stephen Rea monoespressivo. In theory you could easily overlook these faults that last just the movie ... but it is the film that I "can" overfly and made me more curious about the graphic novel.
cmq is to reward fully the character of V, so pervasive that everybody could easily dress up and be like him: a new Darth Vader who gives to the people almost like chocolate wonka (!).

Wall Meets Ceiling 90 Degree

Reinsert the cassette, please ...

It seems that now is the time to put hand to the blog of (pseudo) film criticism.

Is there anything to change. First the title. You always provisional, not to mention the subtitle even more painful. Two: the template. I do not like font colors and more. Heavy and outdated. I think maybe I'll change the platform, offers template splinder otherwise appealing. From
also change the content. No longer a "criticism" ripped from the mouth, but also hot and impressions without the great claim to be argued in detail. Even if someone wanted to read everything, will not be bored.
Not only films but also television, commercials, perhaps, maybe the show: cazzeggiano audiovisual daily. What is this? Perhaps only futile to draw up a list of the best and worst visions, never forget that the image is indifferent and heartless ---> Better Never rely on any form of audiovisual language.