Why the Wachowskis have not only adapted and directed this film? On closer inspection it seems that the decision was the right one. There is visual and aural noise of the last two Matrix, so it's much talk and not much left a bad taste in my mouth.
V for Vendetta succeeds in giving a healthy dusting the genre by adding all totalitarian 'system vs the rebel opposition figure V, incarnation of an ideal of revolution dall'assuefazione of mass is a superman who decides to sacrifice himself becoming the symbol easily penetrable in the minds of those caught up in fear and social priorities of global security. It is a film that will be extremely current draw when real events such as attacks and the spread of bird terrostistici in a fiction that we (and we do it) as a spur to warn our reality. Much more effective, therefore, appears to be this film than the Matrix trilogy mainly because it has been decided to focus more on the script that effects familiar. The density of ideas and elements, however, is complementary to a certain rush to compress the whole story until the final catharsis: the more times we find characters that pop up suddenly and instead would require a less risky approach. In fact, one has to sacrifice something. Among these, the interpretation of a Linear Natalie Portman and Stephen Rea monoespressivo. In theory you could easily overlook these faults that last just the movie ... but it is the film that I "can" overfly and made me more curious about the graphic novel. cmq is to reward fully the character of V, so pervasive that everybody could easily dress up and be like him: a new Darth Vader who gives to the people almost like chocolate wonka (!).
0 comments:
Post a Comment