HARD TIMES FOR INFORMATION.
knew.
paradoxically What struck us was, indeed, as yet not been adequately put to rest a certain kind of journalism. Independent investigation of social protest.
We thought the dg of MAURO RAI MASI to remedy: no more legal cover for Report.
"It 's Rai was openly manifested their intention to take away the legal advice - Milena Gabanelli protest - and do not understand why, since we have not lost a case."
Network's director Paolo Ruffini throws water on the fire, thinking on the reasons that so far, that he was general manager Cappon, have allowed the program to be legally assisted:
"the freelance selling their investigations to Rai. But then are processed by the editors of Milena and then become in all respects material Rai. That is until now, Rai has always delivered a parachute legal "
would wonder where protest ? Who benefits if the freelance have no guaranteed legal assistance? Undoubtedly, the same professionals, one might respond. Of course.
But a professional, knowing that they must take the equivalent in the calculation of the bow of management expenses, the cost of one or more lawyers, is not likely to sell their service (in this case a journalistic investigation) to a more expensive price?
So also the ruling would be less economic. If the RAI will be forced to pay more to performance made by its employees, will have an economic outlay, only part of the burden would be fully offset the costs.
So the failed economic ruling, it still seems valid, the slope of a priori prejudice, pure, without adjectives ... against the free, independent and uncomfortable.
GOOD NEWS:
In an appendix to the Post, in homage to Gabanelli, remember the good news of the day.
From a petition brought by Marco di Lello, the PS, to provide free legal assistance to reports, there has been in a few hours, the accession of 30 lawyers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment